Advanced Prompt Engineering Techniques That Actually Work
Master the art of prompt engineering with battle-tested techniques for getting consistent, high-quality outputs from large language models.
Advanced Prompt Engineering Techniques That Actually Work
Prompt engineering is both an art and a science. After working with dozens of clients and thousands of prompts, we've identified the techniques that consistently deliver better results.
The Foundation: Clear Instructions
Before diving into advanced techniques, nail the basics:
Bad: "Write about AI"
Good: "Write a 500-word blog post introducing AI to small business owners,
focusing on practical applications and avoiding technical jargon."
Technique 1: Chain of Thought (CoT)
Ask the model to think step-by-step:
Solve this problem step by step:
1. First, identify the key information
2. Then, determine what we're trying to find
3. Finally, calculate the answer
Problem: [Your problem here]
When to use: Complex reasoning, math problems, multi-step tasks
Technique 2: Few-Shot Learning
Show examples of what you want:
Convert customer feedback to structured data:
Example 1:
Input: "Love the product but shipping was slow"
Output: {"sentiment": "positive", "issue": "shipping_speed"}
Example 2:
Input: "Great customer service, solved my problem quickly"
Output: {"sentiment": "positive", "issue": null}
Now convert this:
Input: [New feedback]
When to use: Specific formatting, domain-specific tasks, edge cases
Technique 3: Role-Playing
Give the model a persona:
You are a senior software architect with 15 years of experience
in distributed systems. Review this code and provide feedback
focusing on scalability and maintainability:
[Code here]
When to use: Need specific expertise, tone, or perspective
Technique 4: Constrained Generation
Set clear boundaries:
Generate product descriptions following these rules:
- Exactly 50 words
- Include one benefit, one feature, one call-to-action
- Use active voice
- Avoid superlatives
- Target audience: small business owners
When to use: Strict requirements, compliance, consistency
Technique 5: Self-Critique
Ask the model to check its work:
First, write a summary of this article.
Then, critique your own summary:
- Is it accurate?
- Is it concise?
- Does it capture the main points?
Finally, provide a revised summary addressing any issues you found.
When to use: High-stakes outputs, complex tasks, quality assurance
Technique 6: Decomposition
Break complex tasks into steps:
# Task: Create a marketing campaign
Step 1: Analyze the target audience
[Let the model complete]
Step 2: Based on the audience analysis, identify 3 key messages
[Let the model complete]
Step 3: For each message, create a social media post
[Let the model complete]
When to use: Complex projects, when you need control over the process
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
1. Being Too Vague
❌ "Make it better" ✅ "Rewrite this focusing on clarity and reducing word count by 30%"
2. Overloading Context
❌ Dumping your entire documentation ✅ Providing relevant excerpts with clear structure
3. Assuming Knowledge
❌ "Use the standard approach" ✅ "Use JSON format with snake_case keys"
4. Ignoring Model Limitations
❌ Expecting perfect accuracy on factual questions without verification ✅ Using RAG or citations for fact-based responses
Measuring Prompt Quality
Track these metrics:
- Success rate: How often does it work first try?
- Consistency: Similar inputs → similar outputs?
- Efficiency: Token usage vs. output quality
- Error rate: How often do you need to retry?
Production Tips
Version Your Prompts
const PROMPTS = {
  v1: "Summarize this article",
  v2: "Summarize this article in 3 bullet points",
  v3: "Create a 3-bullet summary focusing on key takeaways",
};
// Easy A/B testing
const prompt = PROMPTS.v3;
Add Guardrails
Generate a product description.
Constraints:
- Do not mention competitors
- Do not make health claims
- Do not use superlatives like "best" or "perfect"
- If you cannot generate appropriate content, return "CONTENT_POLICY_VIOLATION"
Temperature Matters
- Temperature 0: Consistent, deterministic outputs (data extraction)
- Temperature 0.7: Balanced creativity (content writing)
- Temperature 1+: Maximum creativity (brainstorming)
The Iteration Loop
- Write your initial prompt
- Test with diverse inputs
- Analyze failures and edge cases
- Refine the prompt
- Repeat until success rate is acceptable
Conclusion
Great prompts are specific, provide context, show examples, and set clear expectations. The best prompt engineers iterate constantly and measure everything.
Need help optimizing your prompts for production? Reach out to our team.
Ready to build your AI solution?
Let's discuss how we can help you leverage AI and LLMs for your specific use case.
Get in Touch